4 ms·
> If person X has that genetic predisposition then what's wrong with that rule? A lot of it would be based on junk science and the low rate of offenders, becau
by donmcronald 3y ago
> If person X has that genetic predisposition then what's wrong with that rule?
A lot of it would be based on junk science and the low rate of offenders, because the diagnosis is bullshit, would be touted as evidence of the value the program is providing.
- memefrog 3y agoSo the problem is basing policy on junk science. Is basing policy on junk science okay in some fields, but suddenly bad when it applied to genetics? Of course not. What if it's not based on junk science, but on good science?