> I do not believe this relatively novel treatment of undefined behavior is useful for programmers. I agree. Does UB allow for compilers to do 'rm -rf /' in ca

> I do not believe this relatively novel treatment of undefined behavior is useful for programmers. I agree. Does UB allow for compilers to do 'rm -rf /' in case of UB? I think some out-of-touch compiler bureaucrats might argue for it, but in practice nobody wants this UB shouldn't be an excuse to language lawyer your way out of what the programmer wrote (and TFA lists a lot of egregious examples)