The assembly example isn't a good comparison. We have compilers that can generate a lot of assembly tricks most programmers wouldn't write. We don't have a way

The assembly example isn't a good comparison. We have compilers that can generate a lot of assembly tricks most programmers wouldn't write. We don't have a way compiler that can analyze the logical constraints of a programming problem and simplify the data structures in the library. > Generic code has proven itself time and time again, even Go caved in and supported it. I'm not saying anything against the language feature generics. There is plenty of use for them even in a self contained code base.