3 ms·
I would love to use boringcc. I do not believe this relatively novel treatment of undefined behavior is useful for programmers.
by marssaxman 3y ago
I would love to use boringcc. I do not believe this relatively novel treatment of undefined behavior is useful for programmers.
- raverbashing 3y ago> I do not believe this relatively novel treatment of undefined behavior is useful for programmers. I agree. Does UB allow for compilers to do 'rm -rf /' in case of UB? I think some out-of-touch compiler bureaucrats might argue for it, but in practice nobody wants this UB shouldn't be an excuse to language lawyer your way out of what the programmer wrote (and TFA lists a lot of egregious examples)
- gavinhoward 3y agoAuthor here. Thank you both for letting me know that you would use boringcc.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]