3 ms·
Filming people without consent, confronting them in a combative way, and monetizing it. There's the litmus test for jerk in 2023.
by bravoetch 3y ago
Filming people without consent, confronting them in a combative way, and monetizing it. There's the litmus test for jerk in 2023.
- mingus88 3y agoI am perfectly fine to weaponize one jerk against many
- latchkey 3y ago> Filming people without consent Given that there are literally cameras everywhere now (including all the Tesla's in the parking lot, with their cams), that's kind of an odd thing to be upset about at this point.
- brvsft 3y agoNot really because many of us have a problem with the cameras that are literally everywhere too.
- cameldrv 3y agoThere’s a big difference between recording to some hard drive and deleting it after 30 days with no one seeing it and deliberately showing someone in an embarrassing situation and showing it to millions of people. I remember back in the 80s/90s Candid Camera and Cops used to get people to sign a waiver, and those that didn’t had their faces pixelated out. If all he wants is to be the cart narc and scold people he could do it without the camera.
- voisin 3y ago> Filming people without consent This is only required where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, which there certainly is not in a grocery store parking lot.
- cortesoft 3y agoThere is a difference between legality and morality
- spookthesunset 3y agoLegally sure. But still doesn’t not make them a jerk.
- reportgunner 3y agoWell if the person just returns the cart they will surely be left alone and not recorded right ? Getting angry over this and even discussing it on the internet requires more energy than simply returning the cart. Returning the cart is good for everyone. Additionally it's a simple contract - if you don't want to return the cart don't take it in the first place.