3 ms·
suspecting the sensors or collection network has been subverted; does it make sense to presume the normal looking signal is the true signal and the abnormal one
by h2odragon 3y ago
suspecting the sensors or collection network has been subverted; does it make sense to presume the normal looking signal is the true signal and the abnormal one is false data? would the opposite assumption have testable traces?
just letting paranoia run free, if theres some later "dirty bomb" whose signatures match chernobyl debris, can that now be tied to either party or has reasonable doubt been established, anyone could have been smuggling some 'stuff" out in that period?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- mannykannot 3y agoI imagine that the prior data is consistent with the contamination being distributed by the wind from the reactor fire, and thereafter being subject only to the weather, and to a lesser extent, geological and biological processes. It seems unlikely, however, that the unusual features of the spikes can be explained by natural processes alone.