5 ms·
A good option is to start by precisely copying simple drawings: while (precise) copy is of little to no artistic value, it's immensely useful to learn the craft
by mbivert 3y ago
A good option is to start by precisely copying simple drawings: while (precise) copy is of little to no artistic value, it's immensely useful to learn the craft.
For a beginner, I would recommend a two-fold plan:
1) spend 80% of your time copying well-chosen works (things you like, and that are at your current level);
2) spend 20% of the remaining time, first getting a firm grip on perspective, and then experimenting, sketching around from life/memory/imagination, etc.
Perspective is foundational[0].
Balancing copy with experimentation is essential: when sketching around, you'll make mistakes and confront yourself to various problems: you'll then be able to look for solutions in the works you're copying.
For 1), perhaps consider Bargue plates[1]: they were precisely designed for beginners, by experienced artists/teachers. There are numerous tutorials (e.g. [2]) on the Internet covering the details, as the plates are used by essentially all modern "ateliers".
A final note on preciseness: it has two main advantages:
1) you can "easily" self-evaluate (as it gives you a clear goal);
2) you're more likely to notice subtle, fine details you would have otherwise missed with a hastier approach.
[0]: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/46915/pg46915-images.html#Chap_CXII https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/46915/pg46915-images.ht...
[1]: https://barguedrawing.wordpress.com/ https://barguedrawing.wordpress.com/
[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZm7qih71-w&list=PLOxIqHbLWHCDIMDWVLgKDrfEhedhB4Bxx https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZm7qih71-w&list=PLOxIqHbLWH...
- kazinator 3y agoIf you want to have some value, precisely copy from photographs.
- mbivert 3y agoNote that a camera (predictably) loses information: working exclusively from photographs can ingrain bad habits to unguided beginners. Furthermore, drawings are often simplified in various ways, stylistically, but not just: trees for instance are more believable, and more efficiently rendered, as vague masses, rather than painstakingly detailed. For the same subject, a drawing/painting and a photograph contains similar information, but with different (lossy) filters; getting to know "artistic" filters is one thing a beginner wants to practice. It's not a bad idea to work from photographs, it's actually very useful, and an interesting technical exercise, but one generally will want to compensate for the camera filter, so as to make the end result more appealing. Incidentally, this[0] was posted a few hours ago, and precisely "illustrates" those points. You also have those "famous" pictures[1] demonstrating how difference focal length distort faces. [0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WpqmQTmnxs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WpqmQTmnxs [1]: https://imgur.com/gallery/kUBPKTy https://imgur.com/gallery/kUBPKTy
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]