3 ms·
> So long as it can do what you want. That is kind of the thing about Emacs and Vim, right? Vim is a text editor. Emacs is... well, Emacs is a text editor, too
by Derbasti 15y ago
> So long as it can do what you want.
That is kind of the thing about Emacs and Vim, right? Vim is a text editor. Emacs is... well, Emacs is a text editor, too. And then an outliner, a news reader, a file manager, a source control interface, a psychiatrist, tetris, a mail client, an IM client and pretty much anything that can be represented in text and simple images.
I used to use Vim for a year or two. Then Emacs, and I haven't looked back. Actually, that is not true. I have looked back quite a bit, since Vim is hands down a better text editor than Emacs. But I can't go back to IDEs really and Vim just sucks as a development environment if you can't combine it with a Unix command line. Emacs is the only great platform agnostic development environment I know, even though it might not be the best text editor out there.
And yeah, there is Evil-mode. It is quite lovely, actually. But my brain just can't cope with dealing with Emacs and Vim simultaneously.
So, I totally agree, you'd be insane not to use Emacs, really.
- read_wharf 15y ago"Vim just sucks as a development environment if you can't combine it with a Unix command line." Where can you not combine Vim with a Unix[-like] command line? I use WinXP at work, and vim works quite nicely in a cygwin terminal.
- Derbasti 15y agoVisual Studio based projects don't play nice with the command line. Linking MFC without VS is a fast path to madness.