3 ms·
I'd never seen the comparison of BEM to OOP and utility-classes to functional programming - I can see how one is more focused on composability and the other ext
by gsuuon 3y ago
I'd never seen the comparison of BEM to OOP and utility-classes to functional programming - I can see how one is more focused on composability and the other extension. I'm not seeing how the approach given here compares with tailwinds?
- meerita 3y agoBoth have utility-driven classes. The main difference is TFCSS doesn't rely on any compilation, and it has it's own syntax, and TFCSS emulates more the CSS syntax.