> If "The UK should have net migration of at least 600k/year" was on the ballot, which way would you vote? LOL at your use of "should". I'd vote "not giving a

> If "The UK should have net migration of at least 600k/year" was on the ballot, which way would you vote? LOL at your use of "should". I'd vote "not giving a shit about migration figures"; if it's ranked-choice, that would be sandwiched above "why is this even a vote, let people live wherever they want" and below "more safe routes for migrants, less gloating about channel drownings".