4 ms·
> "For the product being delivered (low speed, low latency, available only in specific areas), public transit is criminally expensive." This is true - the prob
by potatolicious 3y ago
> "For the product being delivered (low speed, low latency, available only in specific areas), public transit is criminally expensive."
This is true - the problem is that dynamic-dispatch transit is even more expensive on a per-passenger or per-ride basis, and both speed and latency are actually worse than status quo public transit.
It'd be one thing if the result of these projects have been "this is great but expensive", but the result overwhelmingly has been worse than fixed-route bus transit across every major metric.
Autonomous cars can improve the cost problem, but can't dramatically change the calculus on speed and latency. Likewise, autonomous cars can also solve the cost problem for buses, and better!
- triceratops 3y ago> the problem is that dynamic-dispatch transit is even more expensive on a per-passenger or per-ride basis Even if you remove the human driver and the need for a 3-ton piece of metal powered by an ICE? > both speed and latency are actually worse than status quo public transit All the ride-hailing apps seem to appear to disprove this. They're more expensive than public transit for this very reason. > Likewise, autonomous cars can also solve the cost problem for buses, and better! Hear hear!