4 ms·
It's not like they decided to use 100% of donations for other projects, it still supports the Wikipedia.
by dewey 3y ago
It's not like they decided to use 100% of donations for other projects, it still supports the Wikipedia.
- kikokikokiko 3y agoIt doesn't matter. It's highly reproachable that they decided to use the money that people donated to help keep Wikipedia's lights on, on a political endeavour. It sends a clear signal to me to never, ever, give money to them again. It is infuriating to see your resources being employed on political causes that you fiercely oppose.
- micromacrofoot 3y ago[flagged]
- kikokikokiko 3y agoI live in a third world country, so the level of my donations may not compare to the average HN user, but I used to pledge around 5 dollars per year. In the last couple of years to tell you the truth I hadn't donated since I started getting sick of those stupid banners, and now I think it's good that I did not participated in their shennanigans.
- micromacrofoot 3y agoOh no worries, I was just wondering how much I could increase my donation to counter everyone claiming that they'll stop donating in this thread.
- sometimesweenie 3y agoI donate $1,000/yr and I’m stopping due to this
- micromacrofoot 3y agoI see what you're doing and I'm here for it
- notnmeyer 3y agowon’t literally any charity spend money somewhere you wouldn’t necessarily agree with? most of the time you simply wouldn’t know.
- kikokikokiko 3y agoWell, if you donate to a charity that is supposed to do X, and along the way said charity tells the whole world that "by the way, out of every 100 dollars that you donate to us, we'll give 5, maybe 10 dollars, to causes that you absolutely can't stand", you'll only continue donating to this charity if you are a self hating imbecile.
- jasonlotito 3y agoIt's part of the Wikipedia mission. It hasn't been kept secret. It's been well-known for a long time. [1] Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Prime_objective https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Prime_objective
- calpaterson 3y agoI am not sure it does - wikipedia famously does not pay contributors (except for that one guy). The majority of their spending is on wages though, for their 700 employees. I'm sure some of them are doing worthwhile development on MediaWiki etc but I suspect the majority are not. Like Mozilla, the organisation could charitably be described as bloated.
- oxfordmale 3y agoOnly 42% of donations go to Wikipedia and related websites. There is no breakdown for this, and there are likely some vanity projects that are not needed (they mention data analytics)
- omginternets 3y agoAnother thread was quoting 2% for hosting costs, so I'm curious where the 42% comes from.
- oxfordmale 3y agohttps://wikimediafoundation.org/about/annualreport/2021-annual-report/financials/ https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/annualreport/2021-annu...