4 ms·
> It fails to deliver a consistent representatiuon of reality. I'm curious by what precisely you mean by this. Last I checked, reality itself has problems cons
by IKantRead 3y ago
> It fails to deliver a consistent representatiuon of reality.
I'm curious by what precisely you mean by this. Last I checked, reality itself has problems consistently representing itself.
- mrguyorama 3y ago[flagged]
- klntsky 3y agoI mean articles not contradicting each other. > reality itself has problems consistently representing itself In this case neutral statements could be used.
- notpushkin 3y agoI don't think eliminating contradictions matters that much. Wikipedia is a good starting point for reading up on topics that matter to you and then doing your own research, and a nice website to kill a few hours reading about topics that don't. Even with contradictions it works fine for both use cases. It isn't a good encyclopedia, I agree – but what is?