3 ms·

Bold assumption of you, assuming a "patronizing tone" and what I am or aren't seeing -- by that logic, it would seem you "are just not seeing the damage cancer

Bold assumption of you, assuming a "patronizing tone" and what I am or aren't seeing -- by that logic, it would seem you "are just not seeing the damage cancer does" given your ridiculous comparison. Would you cry the same if Hotmail were the predominant platform? Regardless of that, it still wasn't constructive, and your "you might want to x" and "you're not seeing y" comments are much more patronizing than anything else - maybe consider not projecting so hard next time.

gog 3y ago
Thank you for this, you made me laugh. I don't feel like giving in to my inner child so I will not engage any further in this shenanigans, I would just like to answer your question. I am not "crying", but I would be pissed of as well if Hotmail or anybody else was doing the same. This is not about being a predominant platform, but about hurting legitimate email senders to "combat spam" in a way where using their platform, or one of the big players, is the "safest" way to get your emails delivered in a timely manner and land in the recipients Inbox.