4 ms·
> Machines hack differently than humans. An awful lot of hacking is done manually, by humans. For many scenarios, considering human timeframes is completely r
by marcus0x62 3y ago
> Machines hack differently than humans.
An awful lot of hacking is done manually, by humans. For many scenarios, considering human timeframes is completely reasonable.
- hinkley 3y agoWe live in a world where real time advertising auctions happen. If you think there’s something about that which can’t apply to organized crime you’re gonna be in for a rude awakening when your systems start to fail en masse. I’ve had to replace a credit card twice for suspicious activity (once cost me my favorite domain name, which is still parked). There were no major charges in either case. One charge at a business I’ve never been to. Some people get a card and use it. Some immediately sell it after proving it works. That means a clearing house. A food chain. That will get more automated, not less.
- marcus0x62 3y agoSure, there are some attacker activities that are highly automated. That’s not what we’re talking about here. We’re talking about compromised temporal session tokens, which are frequently harvested by manual action, and in those scenarios, thinking about human timeframes is very useful.