4 ms·
Yes, it's poorly titled. The copyright was for the image/animation.
by CharlesW 3y ago
Yes, it's poorly titled. The copyright was for the image/animation.
- xsmasher 3y agoI still don't understand. What was the topic of the video, and how was the image/animation involved?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- rabbits_2002 3y agoit was just used as interstitial animation to show the time of day changed between shots it doesnt really have anything to do with CSS
- xsmasher 3y agoSome video editor is getting fired.