3 ms·
Was it though? I mean, the goal was SSR, but if they had a fully functioning site sans SSR, why not ship now, then deploy SSR whenever it gets baked into Angula
by dabbz 3y ago
Was it though? I mean, the goal was SSR, but if they had a fully functioning site sans SSR, why not ship now, then deploy SSR whenever it gets baked into Angular?
They were using Angular's dependency block them when I don't think they really needed to be blocked to ship a product.
- notnmeyer 3y agoit was the right call. > The relaunch of our ecommerce website had one goal: deliver blazing fast performance with Server-Side Rendering. you’re suggesting they ship a rewrite that doesn’t do the one thing they’re rewriting for? at the time they also didn’t know when ssr support would be available. they switched and shipped ssr support faster than it would have been available otherwise.