> I had a really quick look and couldn't see a way to email him so I didn't bother. It's at the very bottom of the page, under all the ratings: > Questions /

> I had a really quick look and couldn't see a way to email him so I didn't bother. It's at the very bottom of the page, under all the ratings: > Questions / comments can be directed to aaron@andcuriouser.com. It's sort of a footnote, so it's probably easy to miss. > I'll use it more for the information than the ratings. The ratings, from what I can tell, are correct more often than they're not. If the ratings look good, and you're interested in the movie, I'd say go for it. A coworker once told me he doesn't pay attention to bad ratings anyway. He said that if a movie gets a good review, then it's probably at least worth watching because people were finding good things to say about it. If it gets negative reviews, it could just be that it wasn't what the reviewer was expecting or wasn't up to their particular standards. Think of Watchmen: that movie was heavily advertised as an explosive action superhero movie, but those bits are a very brief tangent on an otherwise slow moving character study. It's a good movie, but a lot of people were probably pissed off when they saw it. Still more were probably pissed off because it didn't live up to the book in their minds. Either way, I've been using that site since before the RT integration, and it was always useful. I check it every couple of days and add interesting things to my list/instant queue. It's nicer, to me, to have a textual list of new movies in chronological order than it is to have graphical listings by genre where new things get drown out by less recent, but still "newish" listings in the genre.