3 ms·
The rules of engagement on this site call not for radical candor but for taking the most charitable interpretation of someone's words. Maybe the OP wasn't blin
by jameshart 3y ago
The rules of engagement on this site call not for radical candor but for taking the most charitable interpretation of someone's words.
Maybe the OP wasn't blindly saying 'defend in depth'? Maybe they were advocating for evaluating what that defense does to the product as a whole? If they were, is their attitude worth describing as cancerous?
- horsawlarway 3y agoIf that was my entire comment - I'd probably agree with you. Good thing there's about 5 other paragraphs of content in my response that provide additional context... My take: you're stuck on the word cancer as some sort of insult, rather than an analogy. I'd argue you're being fairly uncharitable in your responses - and further... you're yet again not engaging with the actual on-topic discussion. Have a good one.