3 ms·
> But I’m fine with that because moving money is something that I’m willing to accept however many roadblocks are thrown at me. Really? I'd change banks over t
by ahtihn 3y ago
> But I’m fine with that because moving money is something that I’m willing to accept however many roadblocks are thrown at me.
Really? I'd change banks over that. If I log into my e-banking website, the main activity I'm going to do is pay bills. I would absolutely not tolerate having to jump through hoops to do it.
- cj 3y agoThis is our business account so we're moving anywhere from $20k to $200k at a time. In the spirit of adaptive security, someone moving $100k will probably be fine dealing with a couple extra password / 2fa prompts... but I agree it would be annoying to deal with this for day-to-day (consumer) bill pay. A bank could throw fewer roadblocks when paying a $500 invoice vs. a $50,000 invoice The workflow I described also is part of a dual-approval model where a finance person sets up the transfer and it's approved by a 2nd person (who's presented with a bunch of authentication/password/2fa prompts, almost to a fault). But again, I'm fine with it because it's large amounts of money in corporate bank accounts. But yea, agreed it would be annoying and should be toned down in a consumer use case.