2 ms·
Evidence of harassment is still required. If a person doesn't feel harassed there is no victim. So yes, FEELING harassed is a requirement. That's not the same a
by daveguy 3y ago
Evidence of harassment is still required. If a person doesn't feel harassed there is no victim. So yes, FEELING harassed is a requirement. That's not the same as going to jail on a whim. You complete moron.
- DrThunder 3y agoImagine defending this. Every comment you make is just reinforcing my point. It's hilarious to watch you fumble around with this. If you base a law on subjective feelings towards words said you do not have free speech. I'll say it again, you are an authoritarian and anti-free speech. Just own up to it. It is going to jail on a whim because you can't EVEN DEFINE WHAT THE HARASSMENT IS. What constitutes evidence of harassment?
- daveguy 3y agoSeriously? You again? Here's the federal definition: https://www.eeoc.gov/harassment https://www.eeoc.gov/harassment And since you don't seem to be a big reader, I'll point out the passage that makes you look most like a fool. > Petty slights, annoyances, and isolated incidents (unless extremely serious) will not rise to the level of illegality. To be unlawful, the conduct must create a work environment that would be intimidating, hostile, or offensive to reasonable people. Every time you respond you look more and more like a demagogic tool. Now run along.