3 ms·
The CSS is also inconsistent, if not invalid. (I noticed this two weeks ago while creating a theme for a SSG.) One rule is duplicated (a:visited) where it seem
by PennRobotics 3y ago
The CSS is also inconsistent, if not invalid. (I noticed this two weeks ago while creating a theme for a SSG.)
One rule is duplicated (a:visited) where it seems it should refer to a specific class (.hnmore a:visited):
a:link { color:#000000; text-decoration:none; }
a:visited { color:#828282; text-decoration:none; }
...
.subtext a:link, .subtext a:visited { color:#828282; }
.subtext a:hover { text-decoration:underline; }
.comhead a:link, .subtext a:visited { color:#828282; }
.comhead a:hover { text-decoration:underline; }
.hnmore a:link, a:visited { color:#828282; }
.hnmore { text-decoration:underline; }
Some lines don't have a trailing semicolon while the majority do. 0 probably doesn't need units. ".votelinks.nosee div.votearrow.rotate180" could just have one class rather than this nested thing.
The single-pixel gif as a spacer, that takes my mind back to Geocities.
Sums up software pretty well. If it works, move on to the next thing. No need to get lost in the details that a tiny handful of people see.