4 ms·
Multiple people have posted the same snippet already, and I think it's fairly standard boilerplate in big tech legal documents. For example, I think I remember
by TheAceOfHearts 3y ago
Multiple people have posted the same snippet already, and I think it's fairly standard boilerplate in big tech legal documents. For example, I think I remember reading the same line or similar in iTunes' TOS many years ago.
But this stuff would probably get ignored by any army around the world. And realistically if the US military had to seriously use any of these tools to change the outcome of a conflict, are we going to pretend that this line of legalese is going to prevent them from doing so?
- lolinder 3y agoThis whole page is going to get ignored by anyone who's actually interested in using LLaMA 2 for anything violent or illegal, and their lawyers know it. All of these terms must have a different purpose than actual effective prohibition.