3 ms·
Which shows that you don't need valid HTML to be successful
by Wronnay 3y ago
Which shows that you don't need valid HTML to be successful
- zagrebian 3y agoThe biggest websites are proof that you don’t need web accessibility to be successful either, but that doesn’t make it right.
- marginalia_nu 3y agoI think it's a mistake to conflate being correct (technical property) with being right (moral judgement). Adhering to a standard is quite optional, and most HTML ever written does not. That's just the way it is. This isn't wrong, but it is incorrect.
- zagrebian 3y agoThe question is, is adhering to the HTML Standard (in other words, getting zero errors in the HTML validator) beneficial to websites? For example, does it make the job of web developers easier? Are there fewer user-reported issues in browsers?