2 ms·
> interested in small editors like this Not really interested in small editors like this. Very interested in small editors like* nano, for this root comment r
by Terretta 3y ago
> interested in small editors like this
Not really interested in small editors like this.
Very interested in small editors like* nano, for this root comment reason:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37173126 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37173126
See also the opening paragraph here:
https://linuxize.com/post/how-to-use-nano-text-editor/ https://linuxize.com/post/how-to-use-nano-text-editor/
It's courteous to ensure nano in cattle builds for today's sysadmins that didn't grow up with vi or vim or pick the emacs side of that debate.
- globular-toast 3y agoNano is pretty decent for that reason and I definitely wouldn't grumble at having to use it for tiny tasks like a few lines of config file. Including nano (or any editor) inside cattle doesn't seem like it should be necessary, though. If you can open a shell then you should be able to use tramp or something similar.