For me, the writing style is hard to get past and just isn't executed well when compared with high quality literature. Despite the relatively naive execution,

For me, the writing style is hard to get past and just isn't executed well when compared with high quality literature. Despite the relatively naive execution, the underlying themes are powerful. I think the narrative approach is what makes it possible to revisit repeatedly and pattern match across widely varying contexts. We're story telling creatures and a smarter, more academic recitation of a set of facts and observations probably wouldn't have held up as well. I also agree that it doesn't appear to stand against even small amounts of critical argument while it unfolds, but the central position is so powerful, it's worth suspending disbelief for a bit, enjoy the story and then start taking it apart after it's complete.