> I'd say max 5% and that if the gil removal was a benefit to other optimizations going forward Some of the recent performance improvements came out of the no-

> I'd say max 5% and that if the gil removal was a benefit to other optimizations going forward Some of the recent performance improvements came out of the no-gil camp to show that there was significant room for improvement even with the gil removed. > (they say the opposite: the change with complicate and stall their other optimizations). So they wont actually be stopped, it will just take them a bit longer?