3 ms·
To drive the point home a little a little harder: I don't use Haskell because it has a representation for values which might exist (all languages have that), I
by mrkeen 3y ago
To drive the point home a little a little harder:
I don't use Haskell because it has a representation for values which might exist (all languages have that), I use it because it has a representation for values which do exist.
- tome 3y agoA little harder still: It does not have a representation for values which do not exist! (see also: "make invalid states unrepresentable")