3 ms·
> If SpaceX can sell for less than cost at their current volume, well... good for the tax payers - we're getting a deal. At the cost of killing all other compe
by renonce 3y ago
> If SpaceX can sell for less than cost at their current volume, well... good for the tax payers - we're getting a deal.
At the cost of killing all other competitors and letting SpaceX monopolize so we are stuck with whatever quotes from SpaceX?
- nordsieck 3y ago> At the cost of killing all other competitors and letting SpaceX monopolize so we are stuck with whatever quotes from SpaceX? 1. Are you suggesting that SpaceX will bankrupt Japan (HIII), India (GSLV/PSLV), and Europe (Ariane 6)? That seems unlikely to me. 2. There's very little evidence that SpaceX will jack up prices when they're a monopoly. I mean, they're a defacto monopoly right now (in a limited sense) with ULA transitioning to Vulcan, and ArianeGroup transitioning to Ariane 6. And their prices haven't budged. 3. The DoD (as part of NSSL) and NASA work very hard to split large contracts between multiple launch providers - effectively ensuring that there is no monopoly in US medium-heavy launch providers.
- panick21_ 3y agoNonsense. Complete and uther nonsesens. Anybody who spends even 5 min realizes this is wrong. ULA isnt going away, no-matter how cheap SpaceX is. Arianespace wont go away. China, Russia, India and Japan wont go away. BlueOrigin wont go away. If anything SpaceX has lead to an explosive increase in competition.