4 ms·
Been using it as my main editor for the past 3 years now, coming from Sublime Text. It's been a great editor so far, but it's missing a lot of modern features,
by petabytes 3y ago
Been using it as my main editor for the past 3 years now, coming from Sublime Text. It's been a great editor so far, but it's missing a lot of modern features, and the plugin support seems to be next to none.
- tipiirai 3y agoWhy did you leave Sublime?
- LoganDark 3y agoSublime has syntax highlighting, but no analysis or refactoring features
- dr_kiszonka 3y agoI use Sublime daily exclusively for quick notes and as a scratch pad/clipboard. What I have started noticing recently and what worries me is that with only the most basic Markdown plugins it now uses 1 GB of RAM and is somewhat less snappy than it used to. I really hope it goes away soon but with other editors getting more resource-heavy, I am worried.
- manuelmagic 3y agoI have tens of files open in ST right now and it's using 16 MB of RAM. I'd suggest some tests without the plugins you are describing.
- itsoktocry 3y ago>I'd suggest some tests without the plugins you are describing. How is this useful if you want to use those plugins?
- petabytes 3y ago"Please purchase a sublime text license" popup every 15 saves. Been about 5 years since I last used it.
- akho 3y agoIt's an alternative to nano, not to vsc.
- xp84 3y agoI must be weird because I see a major divide in editors. CLI editors are for light text editing and don’t need plugins. Updating a line in a config file, etc. I’ve never even wished for a plug-in for them. IDEs need plugins. They’re for coding. (I know some people use vim or emacs for coding, with 1000 amazing plugins, but I think deep down they’re masochists in the first place, especially vim.)