5 ms·
Well for one thing a useful definition of “true” would let us decide ethical problems without lapsing into navel gazing until the sun blows up.
by mattnewton 3y ago
Well for one thing a useful definition of “true” would let us decide ethical problems without lapsing into navel gazing until the sun blows up.
- jncfhnb 3y agoTrue ethics don’t exist
- pixl97 3y agoThe problem I have here with your statement, is you have no idea what your definition even entails energy/entropy wise. Just defining the axioms here will take much more time and energy than we have until the sun blows up. Then the combinatorial explosions of ought conditions to step your simulation forward means you'll need Grahams number of time/entropy.
- pixl97 3y agoI just saw today that Innuendo Studios has an excellent video on this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF98ii6r_gU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF98ii6r_gU "You Can't Get Snakes from Chicken Eggs"