> It's a lot easier to have your diverse group 'transmit' in the way they each prefer Your post was thought provoking, something I appreciate. I wondered about

> It's a lot easier to have your diverse group 'transmit' in the way they each prefer Your post was thought provoking, something I appreciate. I wondered about the above statement. Are you saying that "receivers" should be expected to expend more effort than "transmitters"? Wouldn't it be optimal to try to meet in the middle, the sweet spot of easy-as-possible transmission and best-as-possible reception, both sides putting in some effort? My thinking is that communication is about a meeting of the minds, and anything either side can do to make that better helps.