3 ms·

I think https://elicit.org/ https://elicit.org/ is also worth a mention in this context.

• samuell 3y ago
  Elicit is very useful! It can't sometimes answer some very specific and complex questions, but it also doesn't tend to hallucinate anywhere as much as chatgpt. Rather it will be quite upfront about when it can't really find an answer to something.
  • chs20 3y ago
    From which database are the papers that it searches?
    • samuell 3y ago
      According to the FAQ [1] the source is the "Semantic Scholar Academic Graph dataset". [1] https://elicit.org/faq#appendix-how-does-elicit-work https://elicit.org/faq#appendix-how-does-elicit-work
• samuell 3y ago
  I actually think it would make sense for Consensus to try to highlight how they are different than e.g. Elicit, since they already exist on the market since quite some time.
• ZoomerCretin 3y ago
  For my query "Can a LLM be used to build an agent?", elicit gave me highly relevant results, whereas Consensus could not find any relevant or recent results. I'm guessing the difference is that Consensus does not have papers from arxiv. Good find, very useful!