2 ms·
This gets mentioned in the angriest (rightly so) obituary-cum-book review I have ever seen written about anyone ever. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUK14408
by selimthegrim 3y ago
This gets mentioned in the angriest (rightly so) obituary-cum-book review I have ever seen written about anyone ever.
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUK144083343120120222 https://www.reuters.com/article/idUK144083343120120222
(the biopsy line was originally after the quote from the wife abut not opening his body yet)
- CoastalCoder 3y agoGood grief, you're right. Any idea why the author was so harsh?
- noSyncCloud 3y agoGreat article, thanks for sharing. Not nearly enough iconoclasts on HN sometimes – a good take-down is well appreciated.
- turtleyacht 3y agoThank-you for that. > a policy prohibiting employees from talking to one another about any topic about which both parties have not yet been officially "disclosed"--Distortionspeak for "cleared to discuss"--by a higher authority. The most modern of which I've seen so far is Conjecture's infohazard policy: https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/Gs29k3beHiqWFZqnn/conjecture-internal-infohazard-policy https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/Gs29k3beHiqWFZqnn/conje... I can't find the HN submission anymore.