3 ms·
Trackables need some sort of mode where the user can consent to the police putting the trackable into a silent mode while the police investigate, with a fixed e
by exabrial 3y ago
Trackables need some sort of mode where the user can consent to the police putting the trackable into a silent mode while the police investigate, with a fixed expiration. It would be trackable by both the user and police in this mode, and either one could revoke silent mode. I feel like this could be done with some fancy cryptographic signature system to keep mass surveillance at bay (people hold their own private keys).
The primary use case for trackables _is_ recovering stolen property, despite Apple trying to say its "finding lost items". An incredibly small minority of people are using them as a stalking device, even though totally silent GPS trackers have been around for decades at this point.
Apple already has a law enforcement portal it maintains. I feel like they could encourage good behavior by police in this manner while also greatly reducing crime.
- nullc 3y ago> The primary use case for trackables _is_ recovering stolen property Citation needed? Stolen property has to be a rounding error compared to just misplaced things. Stolen property also has the problem that it's not very safe to recover and law enforcement doesn't care even if you know where it is. In any case, sufficiently advanced thieves already get broad spectrum gps/bluetooth/lte/wifi jammers (few bucks on ali-express) or just find the trackers and toss them. Unsophisticated thieves mostly won't tend to find or stop trackers even if they're easily detectable.