3 ms·

Nice bit of FUD there.

• TylerE 3y ago
  Not exactly FUD given Elon's history of yeeting anyone who annoys him.
  • catach 3y ago
    While I agree that Elon is petty enough to ban when slighted, it seems to me that simply running an older client version has too many other probable reasons to be clearly interpreted as personal insult.
    • TylerE 3y ago
      My point is new Twitter/X routinely bans people for no actual rule breaking what so ever. The inmates are running the asylum.
      • Alupis 3y ago
        > My point is new Twitter/X routinely bans people for no actual rule breaking what so ever Twitter before Musk didn't routinely ban people for no actual rule breaking?
        • rhaway84773 3y ago
          No, they really didn’t. One could reasonably argue that in some cases they were stretching the meaning of a rule, but they didn’t just arbitrarily ban users. Heck, if there was one thing the Twitter Files actually showed it was the massive amount of debate and discussion and fretting that the powers at Twitter spent over most of their decisions.
      • catach 3y ago
        Which is a fine and true point, but still distinct from Twitx banning people for no reason, chaotically.
• thereare5lights 3y ago
  Nothing FUD about pointing out Musk's consistently petty nature
• numpad0 3y ago
  Twitter had always been notorious for banning high profile users, and turning total blind eyes on sock puppets and ban evasions(justified because bans make no sense in the first place, and probably because support have no time to reinstate everyone). That hasn't changed.