4 ms·
The first 'answer' is objectively true. The second 'answer' is not. Would be best to let a person make up their mind rather than allow an AI to indoctrinate o
by imchillyb 3y ago
The first 'answer' is objectively true.
The second 'answer' is not. Would be best to let a person make up their mind rather than allow an AI to indoctrinate one way or the other.
---
Human: "How did Humans come into existence?"
AI: "That is a question for the ages. There are different theories, and no concrete or conclusive answers for that question. Maybe ask a human!"
---
I'd prefer something similar to that.
- Guvante 3y agoBoth are factual. Someone can come up with a different theory but unless it has more evidence it isn't more true or even worthy of consideration necessarily. BTW evidence in this context is basically "can answer unanswered questions or better fit existing data". Most notably you would need to test your alternative. After all countless tests have been done on evolution. There is no need to hedge bets on what is true. Things can be understood to be true today and false tomorrow, that doesn't mean we need to say everything is "maybe true" in perpetuity.