4 ms·
Does that invalidate the analogy? The point I'm trying to make is if you rule these behaviors illegal, then you're necessarily making intelligent AI illegal, b
by dilap 3y ago
Does that invalidate the analogy?
The point I'm trying to make is if you rule these behaviors illegal, then you're necessarily making intelligent AI illegal, because humans are capable of the same behaviors.
- endisneigh 3y agoPlagiarism is already a copyright violation so I’m not sure what your point is, and what you’re alluding to is literally what the post is about…
- paulmd 3y agoPlagiarism is not a copyright violation, it’s a violation of the social rules of private (academic) institutions and imposed by those institutions upon their members. If plagiarism was a copyright violation then citing the source wouldn’t make the copyright violation go away. Putting the artists name in the title of the YouTube doesn’t make it not a copyright violation.