The question is really how likely are we to be hit within the relevant time period. Had we taken a slower growth curve, we'd avoid climate change at the cost of

The question is really how likely are we to be hit within the relevant time period. Had we taken a slower growth curve, we'd avoid climate change at the cost of an extra 50 or 100 years before being able to divert asteroids. That seems like a good bet. I am much more worried about climate change and irreversible destruction of ecosystems than getting hit with an asteroid in a very limited time period