4 ms·

This has a ruling, see https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/05/04/us-copyright-office-artificial-intelligence-art-regulation https://www.theartnewspaper.com/202

by 8note 3y ago

This has a ruling, see https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/05/04/us-copyright-office-artificial-intelligence-art-regulation https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/05/04/us-copyright-offi... When you're using ai models to generate the art, it's not considered human enough. If you then make a bunch of modifications to it, sure, but giving the initial prompt is currently insufficient

tticvs 3y ago
> The Copyright Office granted copyright to the book as a whole but not to the individual images in the book Interesting and makes sense. I guess the best comparison I can think of is a random number generated with Math.random() is not copyrightable. But including that random number is a program is copyrightable. I'd say that a corollary to this is that if the images/words generated by the machine are not copyrightable then they cannot also be _copyright violations_