3 ms·

what a poorly written article

• glesica 15y ago
  Needs serious proofreading, yes. But the overall point is valid, though maybe not terribly original. Facebook's valuation seems to be based on exuberance (rational or otherwise) but also on uncertainty. No one really knows how social networking is going to be used going forward. So if you've got a truckload of money you don't really need and like the idea of having two truckloads of money, it might actually seem risky not to invest in Facebook...
• batista 15y ago
  Compared to your eloquent comment, that (besides not capitalizing the first letter of the sentence and omitting the period) doesn't even try to express what is wrong with the article? I'd take the article over it, any day.