4 ms·
I chose Racket for a project that involved lots of AST manipulation. Those ASTs were already in s-expression format, so Scheme seemed a natural fit. The lack o
by chriswarbo 3y ago
I chose Racket for a project that involved lots of AST manipulation. Those ASTs were already in s-expression format, so Scheme seemed a natural fit.
The lack of static types was annoying; Typed Racket helped, but was so slow I only enabled it during unit tests (more precisely: Typed Racket functions can be faster than those written in normal Racket, but calling them from normal Racket functions will be slow as it performs run-time checks)
https://github.com/Warbo/theory-exploration-benchmarks/tree/master/scripts https://github.com/Warbo/theory-exploration-benchmarks/tree/...