10 ms·
Manufacturing a whole new vehicle with a huge ass battery that is more cost intensive to manufacturing than a comparable ICE, a vehicle that due to contemporary
by mustafa_pasi 3y ago
Manufacturing a whole new vehicle with a huge ass battery that is more cost intensive to manufacturing than a comparable ICE, a vehicle that due to contemporary trends has to be a 5-ton lifted SUV, a vehicle that is going to be used by ONE person to commute to work along a fixed predetermined route, a vehicle that is going to be replaced after 3 years because this person have to have the newest four wheels on the lot to project status to attract a status obsessed mate, all that is ALSO EXTREMELY energy inefficient.
If you truly cared about energy efficiency you'd proposition the ban or severe limitation of private car usage in sufficiency dense localities. Public trams and busses, cycling, walking, and maybe even very small private vehicles would be extremely more energy efficient.
There is nothing about a 5-ton EV SUV that says energy efficiency.
- _aavaa_ 3y agoThat's a criticism of trends in automobiles (which I agree with) not something inherent to BEVs. Guess what, if you get a BEV with 1/3-1/4 the battery size, the range is smaller, but for most people it will be fine. And now your vehicle is not lugging around all that excess weight. And do you really need a massive electric pickup truck? It's absolutely possible, but I bet for most people it's a preference.
- mrpopo 3y agoObviously reducing private car usage is a priority. I don't have a car, never owned one, and I'm absolutely in favour of severe restrictions. Now, you have to acknowledge the world we live in, a total ban won't be feasible in the time-frame that we have to combat climate change. (And neither will an electric grid sufficiently powerful to power millions of green hydrogen-powered vehicles or 5-ton SUVs for that matter). Not all EVs weigh 5 tons. Promoting (smaller) EVs for people who need them is a good thing.