3 ms·
The article mentions that the reaction had a 4% yield with lasers that are 0.5% efficient. The 100% yield scenario would yield 75MJ of energy. Modern lasers t
by jkelleyrtp 3y ago
The article mentions that the reaction had a 4% yield with lasers that are 0.5% efficient.
The 100% yield scenario would yield 75MJ of energy.
Modern lasers that are 20% efficient would require 10MJ instead of 400MJ for the reaction.
In theory we only need a 13% yield with modern lasers to reach breakeven. 9% with 30%, 7% with 40%, etc
Note that this is just for this particular pellet they tested - larger pellets likely have better yields due to scaling laws, but would require a more powerful laser array.
I think the article is rather pessimistic, understandably so, but doesn’t really paint an accurate picture of the progress made. If anything, we are closer than we think.
- mjamesaustin 3y agoThis is what the article misses. NIF is doing theoretical testing using extremely inefficient lasers. Nowhere in this article does it mention the gains from using more efficient lasers, instead treating the 400MJ input as a constant. Bad reporting.