2 ms·
that is a very California way of looking at it. Non-competes don't work that way in a lot of places, and few companies outside of the largest would deem to thr
by red-iron-pine 3y ago
that is a very California way of looking at it. Non-competes don't work that way in a lot of places, and few companies outside of the largest would deem to throw that kind of compensation at people if the stock falters -- and only for certain tiers of employees.
IBM would just fire you. Ditto for most of the other F500 sphere.
- theptip 3y agoFair. Perhaps I should be more specific: if your RSUs are <= 10% of total comp, as you say the employer might not top you up, and so conservative rounding down may be more reasonable. If your RSUs are closer to 50% of comp, rounding to zero will unreasonably hurt your comp comparisons, both by sheer magnitude of the grant, and because employer will definitely be conscious of regrants. Not all CA tech companies give huge RSU grants, but the biggest ones tend to.