4 ms·
Next step: mandating compiler vendors to modify compilers so that your code doesn't compile :)
by zb3 3y ago
Next step: mandating compiler vendors to modify compilers so that your code doesn't compile :)
- stackedinserter 3y agoIt's easier to mandate hardware manufacturers to run only approved and properly signed code. Oh wait, we're almost there yet.
- gumballindie 3y agoBetter yet: you'll need a license to compile code.
- Night_Thastus 3y agoYa have a loisence for that gcc?
- superkuh 3y agoRMS is always right and decades ahead (about software freedoms issues): https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html
- jcarrano 3y agoIs it a law of history that those who seemed crazy ended up being right? I remember reading a couple writings by Stallman and it sounded quite outlandish and exaggerate then. Not anymore. See, e.g. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html Oddly enough, the French government has contributed quite substantially to free software.