4 ms·
The conclusion here veers quite rapidly into scientific endism (we've more or less reached the pinnacle of human science, and no further significant advances ar
by alexwebb2 3y ago
The conclusion here veers quite rapidly into scientific endism (we've more or less reached the pinnacle of human science, and no further significant advances are likely to be made) and malthusianism (we lack the resources to do so anyway and are headed for decline as a species).
For me, that colors everything that was said before it, and causes me to reinterpret the objections on cost/efficiency as being rooted in "we're not there yet, and because we're at the end of scientific progress, we'll therefore never get there".
- ooterness 3y agoIt is the 21st century. For more than a hundred years, fusion has been twenty years away. To be a man in such times is to be one amongst billions. It is to live in the cruelest and most bloody regime imaginable. These are the tales of those times. Forget the power of technology and science, for so much has been forgotten, never to be re-learned. Forget the promise of progress and understanding, for in the grim dark future there is only war.