I don’t think you got my point. I didn’t say their science was well done. I said science worked the way it’s supposed to work. Science can’t depend on everyone

I don’t think you got my point. I didn’t say their science was well done. I said science worked the way it’s supposed to work. Science can’t depend on everyone being flawless or above board, being unbiased, etc. the entire process - end to end - is built around the idea that we are all flawed, but through collaboration and rigor, we can see past the flaws to some deeper truth. That’s a collective effort. It’s perhaps easier when everything is done really really well. But it’s more impressive when everything is off the rails.