I quote from the first two paragraphs: "I used to believe that every book has an objective value. And I used to believe that this value is fixed and universal.

I quote from the first two paragraphs: "I used to believe that every book has an objective value. And I used to believe that this value is fixed and universal. Now, I believe it’s much more useful to say something in this form: this book has this value to this person in this context." If you read the article, which I think you did you would know that the person is saying books are inherently good for you and it's based on context. In the right context books are universally good. But I think you just know this. I think you are just lying here. You didn't misread or misinterpret anything. You simply disagree with my opinion. Disagreement is fine, but lying because you disagree is not. You also got personal here you stated that tv perhaps destroyed my attention span. I mean that's close to "stupid". It's literally as far as you can go without straight up calling me stupid. It's still a personal statement or speculation on my character and it's basically an insult. Look if you disagree then vote me down and state your disagreement. But respond respectfully. Don't outright lie and then insult me.