3 ms·
We could make something like the opposite argument too: without technology, biological life has no hope of surviving events like planetary collisions, gamma ray
by jl6 3y ago
We could make something like the opposite argument too: without technology, biological life has no hope of surviving events like planetary collisions, gamma ray bursts, or home star fuel exhaustion, which are rare on human timescales but common (or even inevitable) in the long-run.
- nologic01 3y agoThat is clearly true, but you would have to explain the absence of "technosignatures" - even more so if survival means interstellar spead of intelligent / technological life forms.